🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.