Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards
The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.