🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple clients who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.